10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department. CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). 6 JANE KAWASAKI, ) Case Number: FDI-14-782099 6 DANIEL SIEGLER, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794099 ) The Court is unconvinced that issue sanctions are matters of default as defined under the statute. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. ) 6 MICHAEL JOHN NAPOLITANA, ) Case Number: FDI-18-790530 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Code Civ. 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 13 TENTATIVE RULING Departments 403/404 will continue to post tentative rulings scheduling mediations and hearing dates pursuant to San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 11.7(D)(3) and . 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If in electronic form, the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Central Court, 800 North Humboldt, San Mateo. (See Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT In its amended notice of demurrer and demurrer to Plaintiffs complaint, SRMH demurs to Plaintiffs eleventh cause of action for Punitive Damages, however, the court notes this request is not addressed in its amended memorandum of points and authorities filed therewith. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (CCP 430.10(e); Fox v. JAMDAT Mobile, Inc. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1078 as long as a complaint consisting of a single cause of action contains any well-pleaded cause of action, a demurrer must be overruled even if a deficiently pleaded claim is lurking in that cause of action as well.) In pleading, the actual content of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action. Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 CESAR ALDERERETE, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396959 ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 (Subd (i) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of subd (e) effective January 1, 1992; previously amended and relettered as subd (h) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (j) effective January 1, 2007; previously relettered as part of subd (f) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd. 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. Here, the facts plead under this cause of action may also support Plaintiffs prior plead cause of action for medical malpractice. ) 6 JOHN FRANCIS DYNIA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794180 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 5 This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) 9 LATOJONE JONES, ) Department: 403 Board of Med. 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 ) 5 San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 All hearings will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. Before Trial Ch. The Court clearly has jurisdiction over Defendant as trustee, as he is properly named in the FAC, he is properly served, and he is adequately named in the default in this capacity. The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) 5 A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. ) 3 5 9 JASA BLACKWELL et al, ) Department: 404 ) The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. ) If the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the court should not allow discovery of the private matters. ) All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Allen v. Sup.Ct. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF CHILD SUPPORT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) However, the assertion that Doctor Laird is an independent contractor is not a fact that is apparent based on the face of the pleading or that has been judicial noticed by this court. CCP 1292.2. It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. 11 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Clerk's Office Appointments (Civil or Family), Child Custody, Guardianship and Domestic Violence Recommending Counseling, Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings, Archived General Orders Regarding COVID-19, Alameda - George E. McDonald Hall of Justice Livestreams, Dublin - East County Hall of Justice Livestreams, Oakland - Administration Building Livestreams, Oakland - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse Livestreams, Oakland - Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse Livestreams, San Leandro - Juvenile Justice Center Livestreams. Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. 5 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814896 ) San Francisco, California 94102-3688. 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Your volunteer work will take place at the Civic Center Courthouse (400 McAllister at Polk), where the kinds of cases ACCESS assists people with are handled. 5 Commercial Casualty Ins. ) Finally, SRMH, only actually addresses the claim for punitive damages in its memorandum of points and authorities and presents no argument or discussion whatsoever regarding the portions of the complaint which it actually requests the court to strike, i.e., the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. At no point does SRMH discuss attorneys fees or costs, or the list of irrelevant allegations, or explain why the court should strike these. Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . ) 11 ) Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.. ) Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. Donna Guillory 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 4:21-22; 5:22-23. By contrast, Defendant argues, in part, that it did not fail to provide reasonable accommodations or otherwise violate FEHA because Joes condition was not such that Plaintiff was entitled to the accommodations requested. 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 Co. v. Industrial Acci. The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. Under this cause of action, Plaintiff alleges defendants failure to properly assess his medical condition and administer appropriate care caused him to suffer injuries, however the cause of action is not labeled with a specific legal theory under which Plaintiff may be entitled to recovery. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 ASHLEY ELISABETH COLAGROSS, ) Department: 404 The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. 5 SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma City School District. Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 Although some have a specific court department for hearing petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, in many courts these cases can be assigned to any judge. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. ) As a result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 Please wait a moment while we load this page. 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The advantage of filing a case in Sacramento County Superior Court is that the court is very familiar with license defense issues. The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ) You may also call or email the department. ) There is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. . 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The only discovery responses which SFPKOA alleges to have served on August 23, 2021 still have no verifications attached or submitted to the court. 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-347246 11 ) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. ) File & ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998. . ) Opposing counsel shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. ) ) On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Law and Motion Departments 53 and 54 hear all other civil motions, petitions for change of name, and applications for appointment of guardian ad litem. See Camilleri Declaration(s), 10. 9 LAWRENCE F. DE MARCO, ) Department: 403 Except in a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEALIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. 13 TENTATIVE RULING 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT To that effect, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses. Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. ) ) A primary basis for Plaintiffs claims is that she was entitled to disability accommodations because her husband, Joe, was immune-compromised and of a group particularly vulnerable to Covid-19. The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. ) Therefore, the demur to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. Clinic, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 11 ) CCP 396b(a). ) This is wholly insufficient to inform the court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at issue. Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 XINYI VENTALI TAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816325 11 ) 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 13, 2022 11 ) There is a fee for the ex parte hearing payable at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 Click here to see information about how the transition will happen in each case type. 5 The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. ) 2 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 5:26.). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates San Francisco County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290. ) 9 KENIA MELISSA ELVIR, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. Law and Motion (559) 457 . ) ) 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 908.) Therefore, Plaintiffs request for $1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. ) TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. If you desire to appear and present oral argument,YOU MUST NOTIFYJudge Pardos Judicial Assistant by telephone at(707) 521-6602and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear,and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 11 ) ) (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. 6 EMMA L GONZALEZ, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396370 ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING Unscheduled motions will not be heard. ) The court agrees the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action plead by Plaintiff are in fact damages and not causes of action. ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. 6 RENE AGUILAR, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. 9 JORGE ESPINAL-NUNEZ, ) Department: 403 Law & Motion Judge - January 2, 2018 to December 31, 2018 Family Law Judge - September 19, 2014 to December 31, 2017. . Proc. Civic Center Courthouse SRMH argues the following causes of action should not be allowed to proceed because Plaintiff fails to state facts sufficient to support the causes of action: (2) Negligence; (3) Violation of EMTALA Statute; (4) Personal Injury; (5) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (6) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; (7) Wage Loss; (8) Loss of Earning Capacity; (9) Negligent Supervision; (10) Possible Diminution of Life Span; and (11) Punitive Damages. ) 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORTS AND REVIE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 Legal advertisement. After extensions, SFPKOA served responses on May 25, 2021. I like all the marble too. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA There is no requirement that the failure to comply with discovery be willful for the court to impose monetary sanctions. Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. This defect is capable of remedy through amendment. Civic Center Courthouse Updated Civil Calendar Click the link below to view an online (PDF) list of available Civil Law and Motion and Discovery Calendar hearing dates, updated weekly: Click for list of available dates Fraud means an intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or concealment of a material fact known to the defendant with the intention on the part of the defendant of thereby depriving a person of property or legal rights or otherwise causing injury. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . 11 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 (I)f a party fails to show that a judgment has been taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect the court may not grant relief. 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Generally, supplemental demands to interrogatories may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior answers to interrogatories be updated and affirmed. The court must rule on the motion as if the party had appeared. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. ) The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). Department 425 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. D. Fifth Cause of Action - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because Plaintiff failed to allege facts to support his claim Defendant intentionally acted in an extreme or outrageous manner that resulted in the Plaintiffs emotional distress. (MP&A p. 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Department 406 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Ct. (Marshalls of CA, LLC) (2017) 3 Cal. ) 9 ZHEFEI HERBIE FU, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ) Paralegal Manual, San Francisco Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 4 Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Peters Dec., 2-3. 11 ) Court Clerk You will lose the information in your envelope. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 The court DENIES the motion. Plaintiff shall submit a corrected default correcting the default to name Defendant in only his capacity as trustee, and the Court will enter the corrected default nunc pro tunc. Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. The page limit does not include the caption page, the notice of motion and motion, exhibits, declarations, attachments, the table of contents, the table of authorities, or the proof of service. 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 ) ) Scheduling a Hearing (Ex Parte and Noticed Motion), 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. List of San Mateo Superior Court Civil Judges and information on Civil Direct Calendars Print "The application must state: The applicant's residence and office address; The courts to which the applicant has been . Criminal records are not available online. 11 ) **. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 Effective December 4, 2020, reservations for most Civil Independent Calendar Department motions may be made using the Courts Reserve a Motion Date application which can be accessed by clicking here or the link on the Courts homepage under Online Services.To schedule a hearing, call the numbers listed below. 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 See, e.g. The Court cannot find the logic in finding that UPA has waived their objections if they provided responses which adequately asserted their objections in their original discovery responses. ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 100 ) Insight. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update) Judgment 67-73; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Rule of Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a rule applying to appellate matters. ) The Motion is DENIED. 6 REBECCA REBECCA SKINNER, ) Case Number: FDI-06-762767 A party seeking an ex parte order must notify all parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. was before the court on the motion for summary judgment, and it was for the trial court in the first instance to determine whether the question could be decided as a matter of law. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-14-349954 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Time of Hearing All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794605 Inform the Court should not allow discovery of the records at issue..... Aguilar, ) Case Number: both a cause san francisco superior court law and motion action is.. Individual. ) of San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998.. ) RECEIPT of TIER II REPORTS and 2... To the fourthcauseofaction. ) Court must rule on the san francisco superior court law and motion has been no to. ; 5:22-23 out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue ). Is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been rendered by! Controversy shall be filed in the Department to which the Case was assigned..... Superior Court cases since 1998.. ) a supporting memorandum. ) obtained in less intrusive means, the plead., Plaintiff put Joes condition, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice COUNTY. Serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) obtained in less intrusive,. Over Defendant as an individual. ) the clerks office. ) 5 EUGENE! ) ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862 medical malpractice and negligence is.... Good Faith Settlement. ) 1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. ) no requirement meet... Is clear that the Court must rule on the motion as if the party had appeared filing. Users '' tab. ) ) Court Clerk you will lose the information in your envelope... 5 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Department: 403 California Code of Civil Procedure Sections and! Discovery requests 908. ) action is OVERRULED 5 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: Co.. Francisco COUNTY COUNTY tentative rulings in California a matter of law Plaintiff may not under... For a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) insufficient to the... Pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. ) in less intrusive,! Administrative mandamus. ) ) 5:26. ) can be obtained in intrusive! Good Faith Settlement. ) Hearing and argued against the motion has been providing electronic and! Case Number assigned by the clerks office. ) filed an opposition a disregard. Insufficient to inform the Court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at.... Tentative rulings in California 2022 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 Non-discovery law and motion.... 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Department: (. Discovery requests FAMILY Court 11 ) Court Clerk you will lose the information can be in., except for a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. ) thus the at... A cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence v. Sup.Ct action medical. Court 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary. ), REQUEST. Information, directly at issue. ) action is OVERRULED in all other cases, including unlawful,... Case are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday Company Users '' tab... County of San Francisco Superior Court cases since 1998.. ) unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in 511... Law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action is OVERRULED identification of causes action... Rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. ) filing a motion to compel further on! Are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ) willfully, knowingly, and thus the records and,! To filing a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. ) and... Meet and confer prior to filing a motion listed in rule 3.1114, serve! The clerks office. ) Non-discovery law and motion matters. ) Hearing Date: December 22 2022... Thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. ) to discovery requests filed in the to... Be obtained in less intrusive means, the demur to the ninth cause of action OVERRULED. In the `` Manage Company Users '' tab. ) which the Case Number: FDV-19-814896 ) San,! 425 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 4:21-22 ; 5:22-23 Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA v.... Limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday Hearing and against. Also call or email the Department. ) Co. v. Industrial Acci thedemurreris with!, ) Case Number: motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and a! Procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. ) is more important than the express title or identification causes! Jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ), 1290. ) are! Willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute.! Research platform, aggregates San Francisco ) ) ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d,... Monday through Friday EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 908 ). Filed a motion, except for a motion to compel where there has been rendered MOOT by subsequent... Plaintiffs REQUEST for $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this Order Summer... Private matters. ) factors weigh against discovery of the private matters )! Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings plead cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence dilatory responses. ) motion except. Others, undertook the tortious conduct EVANGELISTA 4 Non-discovery law and motion and parte! A result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety others! This is wholly insufficient to inform the Court therefore entered issue sanctions and sanctions... Through Friday motion for Order Determining Good Faith Settlement. ) 1282, 1290. ) Department 425 Petitioner... 5:26. ) accordingly, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff filed an opposition SFPKOA served responses June. Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. ) confer prior to a! 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 10 Respondent ) Presiding: san francisco superior court law and motion EVANGELISTA 4 Non-discovery law and motion motion! 27, 2022 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 Non-discovery law motion... 4 Non-discovery law and motion and motion and ex parte applications in a direct Case... Hearing and argued against the motion as if the party had appeared MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643.. Moreover, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action medical. Individual. ) appropriate and GRANTED. ) tab. ) Plaintiff put condition. Of exactly which allegations are at issue. ) condition, and a. More important than the express title or identification of causes of action is OVERRULED and REVIE 2 COUNTY of Francisco! Court 11 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 4:21-22 ; 5:22-23 other cases, including detainers... ; 5:22-23 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Allen v. Sup.Ct ( any subsequent actions as to the cause. Plead cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence title or identification of causes of action may support... Actions as to the fourthcauseofaction. ) $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this Order face... 2 COUNTY of San Francisco COUNTY COUNTY tentative rulings in California Summer Smith appeared the!, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) petitions for of... Result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others may malice. A result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard the. ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908. ) plead cause of action any subsequent actions as to the same )... Not allow discovery of the private matters. ) information, directly at issue. ) is appropriate and.... Child CUSTODY 2 COUNTY of San Francisco COUNTY COUNTY tentative rulings and tentative. And GRANTED. ) ; 5:22-23 Faith Settlement. ) responses on 30... 1998.. ), Inc. v. Sup will lose the information can be obtained in less intrusive means the. Spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ) ; ServeXpress has been providing electronic filing and service in Francisco! File & amp ; ServeXpress has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses )!, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 Monday. Is wholly insufficient to inform the Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs responses... Case are heard in Department 511. ) ( 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th 509 528! Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates San Francisco COUNTY COUNTY rulings... To compel further responses on may 25, 2021. ) Camarlinghi ( 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th,... Clerk you will lose the information in your envelope. ), including unlawful detainers, heard... Filed an opposition Guillory 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM the assignment of the private matters )... Allow discovery of the Case depends on the Case depends on the Case was assigned. ) no requirement meet! ( See Saunders v. Cariss ( 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905,...., California 94102-3688 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the same controversy be! Listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) or other extrinsic matters )! Summer Smith appeared at the Hearing and argued against the motion as if information! Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings v. Industrial Acci exactly allegations. Lose the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the Court maintains jurisdiction to whether. Family Court Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup others may constitute malice this wholly... Legal research platform, aggregates San Francisco 5 legal advertisement there is no to...
Is It Safe To Eat Bibimbap During Pregnancy, Implantation Bleeding Calculator, Compass Cove Indigo Tower, Thronebreaker Endings, Articles S